Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Well, you want to do this and that by feeling. Neurons passed, I realized my feeling. Then I realized the consequences. I predicted everything. Then I thought, what if there's a chance? That is, a person can look into the future with the same neurons, but at the same time they weigh them, and what if my forecasts are not correct? You can't predict everything for sure. What if there are no consequences? Or will they? Or won't it? And the neurons are boiling, quarreling. In general, I (and not only) have long been interested in the question of what a thought is. That's in essence, in form, in essence, in content, in matter. But no one really knows this, so with T. Z. philosophies and the like, there's unlikely to be an answer, at this point in time.
The conflict of mind and feeling means that a person is aware of their own powerlessness in trying to control their feelings. It is difficult for a person to accept that physiological processes affect his condition much more than intelligence. That it looks like a boat without a sail and oars in the middle of the ocean.