- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Epistolary significance of religions.
EGTR asserts that there is a single task for any civilization that is based on “intelligent activity, solved with the constant development and complication of the genetics of the mind carrier, which, as it develops, ensures the” improvement “of intelligent abilities.
What is this task?
EGTR claims that this is an external task in relation to the human body – the task of developing the Mind in the external environment, (from the point of view of religion, this is the will of God), we can judge it only to the extent of the resolving ability of the mental and genetic capabilities of our mind. However, the process of Mind development itself, in which the intelligent human body “takes a direct part,” should be clear to us. What is it?
The civilizational cycle of human intelligence development consists of three main stages of intelligent transformation of the world:
1. at the first stage of the development of civilization, humanity needs to “see and understand the laws of nature (which is mainly related to “genetic spirituality”),
at the second stage, on the basis of understood laws, this nature should be presented in an expedient and reasonable form (which is connected with the concept of spirituality and reasonableness).
the third step is to change the environment according to these ideas ( which is mainly related to genetic intelligence).
These are three stages of the development of the environment, in which the human being takes a direct part, the ideology of the three main world religions, each of which has a corresponding genetically predetermined emotionality of the Nervous System (NS), can not be better viewed.
The intelligent activity of humanity consists in the following:
Namely: “Christianity in the plot of the one God divided its essence into three components, which made it possible to develop the emotions of constructivism as intensively as possible, which was not available in the paradigm of Judaism, since the maximum emotional orientation in Judaism falls on cognitive abilities. The presence of “three hypostases of God” in Christianity makes it possible for the believer's consciousness to transfer the “Holy Spirit “ – i.e., knowledge received from God — to” God the Son” – i.e., matter, in other words, to deify, spiritualize “dead” Matter. In Christianity, first of all, these are icons and relics of saints, and ultimately these are projects and technical documentation designed in accordance with the laws of the universe. Constructivism in Judaism is a secondary intention, “even forbidden,” while in Christianity it becomes the main and main intention, which gives excellent results in constructive reasonable activity, starting with the system of Christian rites of worship and ending with the scientific and technological revolution carried out by the Christian world.
However, in constructivism, there is some emotional instability, divergence,and emotional instability that allows you to iterate through the design options, which is not acceptable in the execution of an already adopted design decision.
Thus, if we speak in the language of genetics: “if Judaism is a philosophy that causes the development of the human genotype in the direction of the implementation of the psychology of cognitive activity, then Christianity develops genetics in order to improve constructive activity, and Islam, respectively, is the third religious philosophy aimed at improving human genetics for the implementation of “executive” reasonable activity.
These conclusions proposed by the Theory of Emotional Genetic Development are based on axioms and postulates of a materialistic and scientific nature. EGTR provides important forecasts and recommendations related to the economy, culture and politics, as well as the problems of creating an Artificial Intelligence Carrier (AI).
And now back to the question of the emotional compatibility of Jews, Christians and Muslims.
From the above, it follows that the manifestation of positive emotions (sympathies) contradicts the fulfillment of epistolary tasks set by God. Some aspects of the psyche that a Jew does not like should not be liked by a Muslim and a Christian. The problem of “compatibility of religions” must be solved at the level of realizations of the “Mind”. Emotionally, they are not compatible and it is appropriate. Every bearer of a religious cult must understand and conscientiously fulfill his or her well-known mission in the development of Reason on Earth, while ” he or she must respectfully treat his or her religious neighbor, who is doing his or her best work entrusted to him or her by God. Religion, thus forming the consciousness of believers, creates three different constructs of brain activity and, as a consequence, psychology reduced from the genome ,each of which best meets one of the three main tasks facing development: cognition, construction and implementation of Reason on Earth.
Preparing the conditions for the emergence of an ” Artificial Mind Carrier “on Earth is a task that all religions of the world should unite to solve, each of which has played and will continue to play its important role in the development of the Mind, forming the type of psychology of a believer at the genetic level. This makes it possible to divide the intellectual labor of our civilization to create a Mind on the Planet and a more perfect carrier of it.
Each religion performs its assigned work, since each religious philosophy, through generations of gender choice, genetically forms a certain way of thinking in the person who professes it.
At the same time, each religious denomination, in the general form of the beauty of the world around us, forms its own priorities in the vision of beauty (and justice), and thus it becomes possible to “focus the efforts of humanity to maximize the impact in various types of intelligent creative activities “carried out” with the participation of man in its various forms, ” each of which only in joint implementation is aimed at achieving a single goal set by God.
Philosophy is a form of “rational thinking” that corresponds to the quality system of emotionality that was once organized by its founder and was received for storage, use and development in the external environment, in the form of cultural heritage. This system determines the basic emotional constructs of нейро neurons in the body's neural network and refers to emotions of high levels of complexity of perception and recognition (cognition) of environmental events. Each philosophy contributes to the intensification (maximization) of the cognitive process in a specialized, most suitable, “thinking ability (intelligent) activity, exerting a direct influence on the formation of not only a reasonable product of thinking, but also through generations leaving its imprint (forms) on” physiological neural structures and the predisposition and purpose ” of activity centers responsible for human mental abilities. �The influence of philosophy on the genotype is carried out through the form of the mutating karyotype of the organism.
Each religious philosophical system решает solves its own Divine epistolary (epistolary — Comes from the other Greek ἐπιστολή “assignment”) task.
At the same time, religious peculiarities and related contradictions, unfortunately, cause a conflict of interests, which is a natural mechanism for highlighting and ensuring the inviolability of the main direction of this epistle — the creation of Artificial Intelligence.
Epistles of Judaism
Judaism, having a single genetically and “cytogenetically” reduced psychological basis associated with the absolutized unity of Reason, is aimed at individual reasonableness, which is expressed in union (fusion, partnership) with reasonable divine perfection. This is clearly reflected in the achievements of cognitive, divergent thinking of Jews, expressed in the number of Nobel laureates per capita of the nation. The Jew is a GREAT EDUCATOR.
Epistle of Christianity.
Christianity is intentionally aimed at constructing reasonable material objects. Christians have implemented NTR and created a massive industry and economy.
The philosophy of Christianity (in contrast to Judaism) allows us to transfer spirituality to the objects of the material world, thanks to the axiomatic division of the one God into the triune-God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Such a division makes it possible, in the intention of thinking, to transfer spirituality to material objects, that is, to design and construct material objects by transferring “Divine Revelations”to them. The origins of intentional constructivism in Christianity are expressed, for example, in the spiritualization of icons and other material objects of worship. Christians are GREAT DESIGNERS.
Epistle of Islam.
Islam, psychology is potentially aimed at the materialization of the formed reasonable model, these are GREAT PERFORMERS for whom casual divergent thinking is an obstacle to achieving their set reasonable goals. It is no coincidence that this belief prohibits the use of alcohol – as one of the mechanisms of divergent thinking.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam include some “opposite emotional orientations,” which, as we can see, create psychological difficulties when interacting directly with them, since with opposite intentions it can be very difficult for people to get along and agree on what is good and what is bad.
In conclusion, I will cite a parable that arose in my mind in connection with these ideas:
People gathered once and got thirsty. This requires water, and to survive, you need to get it out of the ground… . Then a Jew comes forward and points out where to dig, a Christian comes out and says how to dig, a Muslim comes out digging according to a project that was created by a Christian in the place where the Jew indicated and gets water for everyone and everyone drinks.
Moreover, it is safe to say that each representative of one of these religions can perform these three actions alone, but at the same time it is safe to say that everyone can do a certain part in the overall work better than others, since this coincides with his centuries-old main intention of religious faith.
This is too general a question. First, you need to narrow down the scope and decide on the ultimate goals of this research, if you don't want to turn it into a profession.