Categories
- Art (181)
- Other (1,727)
- Philosophy (1,387)
- Psychology (1,935)
- Society (505)
Recent Questions
- What to do when you are so bored that you are too lazy to do anything?
- Is it true that people don't really need real freedom, and is it true that the wise man is free even in prison?
- Is non-materialistic science possible in the future?
- Can temperament change with age?(choleric – – – melancholic)
- There are two brothers: Judaism and Christianity. They have a disagreement about Jesus. And then there is an arbitrator – Islam. Is this the wisdom of God?
I don't think so.
The fundamental difference is that they tend to have different effects.
Pop art strives for recognition, for clarity to the unprepared, ordinary viewer. Therefore, pop art chooses as its object what we often see or discuss (the lives of stars, money, brands, etc.).
Pornography tends to arouse the viewer, and its objects are rather taboo for general display (and perhaps someone is also rejected). In addition, pornography tends to be realistic, and pop art has a lot of convention.
In some ways, pornography is the closest thing to hyperrealism. However, if you cross pornography with glamour, it will already be close to pop art. For example, look at the works of Terry Rogers – what are they more, porn or glamorous post-pop art?