Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,009)
Recent Questions
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
- Do people with Down syndrome understand that they have abnormalities? How do they see the world? Are they self-conscious about their illness?
I don't think so.
The fundamental difference is that they tend to have different effects.
Pop art strives for recognition, for clarity to the unprepared, ordinary viewer. Therefore, pop art chooses as its object what we often see or discuss (the lives of stars, money, brands, etc.).
Pornography tends to arouse the viewer, and its objects are rather taboo for general display (and perhaps someone is also rejected). In addition, pornography tends to be realistic, and pop art has a lot of convention.
In some ways, pornography is the closest thing to hyperrealism. However, if you cross pornography with glamour, it will already be close to pop art. For example, look at the works of Terry Rogers – what are they more, porn or glamorous post-pop art?