Categories
- Art (176)
- Other (1,645)
- Philosophy (1,344)
- Psychology (1,857)
- Society (492)
Recent Questions
- Why do Muslims hate Jews?
- Second love: is there or isn't there?
- What kind of attitude to nature can you learn from our distant ancestors?
- What is the difference between ancient Greek and modern philosophy?
- What second language besides English should I choose to study if there is no direct need, but I want to / for the future/and suddenly it will be useful?
An important characteristic of belonging to art is the author's intention – not just to concoct something there, but an author's statement with some non-banal meaning. This is the difference between art and craft.
An important characteristic of belonging to pornography is also the author's intention – to create a product that produces sexual arousal. That's why it differs from eroticism.
So it would be more correct to put the question like this: are these intentions compatible? Can pornography be an art form? Because the answer to this question is obvious-no, it is not, the intention of the pornographer does not automatically follow the intention of the artist.
Personally, it seems to me that the task is basically feasible, although not trivial. I'm not ready to give you any examples.