Categories
- Art (231)
- Other (2,273)
- Philosophy (1,692)
- Psychology (2,415)
- Society (596)
Recent Questions
- Is it true that left-handers are very different from right-handers (left-handers are creative, left-handers are harder to teach, different hemisphere, etc.)?
- What is life to you?
- Why do people ask the question " What is the meaning of life?"
- If I stay up all night before the exam and go to it in the morning(at 9 o'clock), will I think worse, slower, or something else?
- How do you learn to think outside the box?
There are 0 integers on this segment, a countable set of rational numbers, and an uncountable set of real numbers. That is: if it is a segment of real space, then it is mathematically continuous, if it is a segment of past time, then it is everywhere dense, and if this segment describes physical interactions at a future moment in time, then it is an empty set.
We can say that this is significant in the sense that it allows us to compare the segment from 0 to 1 with the set of all real numbers and conclude that they are equally powerful. Indeed, it is quite simple to establish a one-to – one correspondence between them, for example, like this: y = log((1 – x) / x), where x is a number from the interval (0, 1), and y is any real number. If you want to include the boundaries of the interval, you can extend the corresponding set of real numbers by infinities.
Here's a fun fact – one set is a subset of another, and their cardinality is the same. The same trick can be performed with a set of natural numbers, removing, for example, all even numbers from there.
If; 10=0.9 is equal in decimal, you can theoretically study both the properties of a black hole and the Big Bang theory, and not create a black hole with a Large collider…
This is another scientific achievement. It can be the pride of the scientific world, proving the limitless possibilities of scientific thought. This is a fundamental knowledge that every person who respects science should know.
And so no.