Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Popper's main point is that Plato's political model, described in The State and the Laws, is a theoretical justification for the totalitarian state.�
Indeed, for all Plato's insight into politics, and for all his quite fair reference in The State to the problems of existing political regimes in which we are doomed to live (Plato's ideas in this regard, by the way, are quite relevant and can be used in understanding modern politics), the cure for “vicious forms of government” offered by Plato seems to be in many ways worse than the disease itself.
First of all, Plato's political ideal undoubtedly tends towards a totalitarian model in which the individual is subordinated to the State in all respects. Plato himself makes this clear in the seventh book of the State:
As for the “concentration camps”, the closest analogue of such a policy, it seems to me, can be seen in the fifth book of the Laws, where Plato writes about the need to” purge ” the state of unreliable people, and not only from criminals, but also, for example, from potential rebels.