Categories
- Art (264)
- Other (2,577)
- Philosophy (1,862)
- Psychology (2,729)
- Society (666)
Recent Questions
- How to draw Fortnite in pencil?
- How do you feel about women who are stronger and smarter than men, would men build relationships with such women?
- Would you still be an atheist if atheism did not bring with it the benefits of technological progress? And when will the atheistic equivalent of heaven on earth arrive at the end of this journey?
- If you could only have one of two senses: sight or hearing, which would you choose?
- How to overcome laziness and increase the desire to study? Can you tell me some techniques and tips?
No, I don't agree, it's not always used as an offensive word.
Here is a description of sex with a person who does not want it, does not mean it, is used everywhere as an insult. The fact that the words used in this case acquire a certain negative meaning is secondary. It's like the smell left over from bad use.
At the same time, I can quite calmly imagine some song or something with this word that does not carry a negative in itself.
Oh, wait, in the question “more often”.
Well, yes, the fact is that it often expresses the active side of the action, so it is more often used in describing offensive actions.
By the way, it is interesting that the word” e ” describing the action originally meant the active action of a woman (so in etymology).
First, not all of them. Secondly , as monotheistic (mainly Abrahamic, can someone add) religions spread, obscene vocabulary often developed as a counterbalance to previous beliefs that were based on the most primitive archetypes. These include the masculine and feminine principles, as well as their interaction.