Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Most likely, they are connected by the fact that the “Slavic thin bodies” are a direct syncretic borrowing and new-age new-model bullshit.
We took the chakras from Hindu yogis, screwed up their “Slavic” names and voila-we got a product that is very tasty for all sorts of neo-Pagans, Aryans, and other schizos.
there are no chakras in Buddhism. this is a yogic concept and that… not every yoga school recognizes them. there is a certain concept of chakras in Vajrayana, but only a conditional gradation, and there they have the character of mental centers.�
as for the Slavs… they did not have anything about yoga, chakras, Vedas in their courses, since Slavic and Indian cultures were not communicated … from the word “absolutely”. therefore, it was impossible for them to understand what was invented on another corner of the globe by someone who was not clear.�
according to some chakra systems in shaktism (Shaivism) also 112, and in some cases 114, are added two beyond form and materiality.�
and finally… there is nothing in common between the understanding of chakras and “spiritual bodies”, because the chakras – “wheel” – means the centers of certain energies in a person, these are not astral bodies or spiritual clothes.