Categories
- Art (216)
- Other (2,126)
- Philosophy (1,613)
- Psychology (2,279)
- Society (561)
Recent Questions
- What is Wittgenstein's book Philosophical Studies about and how to read it?
- Why does a man have four wives in Islamic countries and they don't cheat, but in Russia there is only one wife, but she most likely does?
- How do magicians manage to guess the card that you MENTALLY chose from the deck?
- Can a person understand that he has gone mad?
- Have you had any difficult and hopeless situations in your life that you still got out of?
Of being [as such] we can say that it is; in other words, pure being is an immediacy that contains nothing in itself, as nothing, equal to nothing else; for if being had a certain content in itself, it would not be an indefinite immediacy, which is the opposite of a definite [concentrated] being, an existing being. To paraphrase, being is strictly indeterminate, so there is nothing, so it has no properties; if A is characterized by the same relations and connections that B is characterized by, then A and B are identical, and therefore being is identical with nothing. Conclude: clean Genesis contains net nothing but net nothing contains pure being, respectively; being and nothingness taken make up the whole, however, common sense is not a being and nothing; in Hegel the absolute is the being, when we Express existence as a predicate of a universal, or whole, but nothing (oblivion, denial of existence) is also an absolute, or absolute negation, or the first principle, and the whole — the coincidence of essence and existence in the reflection in itself, one who is absolute basis, which is its own cause.