- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
No way. Here you can quote the conclusion of Weininger's biographer Chandak Sengupta.
Weininger's book is interesting mainly because it was a bestseller at the beginning of the century, because it attracted the attention of a wide variety of people, far from psychology, physiology or philosophy.�
Nikolai Berdyaev, in a long review of 1909, remarks:�
That's exactly what happened.
In philosophical circles, Weininger's book is known for being read by Wittgenstein.�
Wittgenstein's opinion was as follows:
Accordingly, philosophers do not care about Weininger in any way. It concerns historians of philosophy in connection with Wittgenstein:
The collection Wittgenstein reads Weininger, edited by David Stern, is devoted to the study of this issue.
A brief introduction to Weininger's views:
It would be surprising if there were professional philosophers willing to treat this as anything other than a hack.