
Categories
- Art (180)
- Other (1,693)
- Philosophy (1,368)
- Psychology (1,900)
- Society (498)
Recent Questions
- Why do people always judge other people's views on life?
- If there is a God, then why do we need people?
- I have no meaning in my life. Please help me. The problem is described in the answers.?
- What do Christians think of Stephen Fry's famous monologue to the Lord ("How dare you?”)? If you think he's wrong, can you explain why constructively?
- How can I exhibit street art? Are there any areas that can fit into the space of a gallery or museum?
No way. Here you can quote the conclusion of Weininger's biographer Chandak Sengupta.
Weininger's book is interesting mainly because it was a bestseller at the beginning of the century, because it attracted the attention of a wide variety of people, far from psychology, physiology or philosophy.�
Nikolai Berdyaev, in a long review of 1909, remarks:�
That's exactly what happened.
In philosophical circles, Weininger's book is known for being read by Wittgenstein.�
Wittgenstein's opinion was as follows:
Accordingly, philosophers do not care about Weininger in any way. It concerns historians of philosophy in connection with Wittgenstein:
The collection Wittgenstein reads Weininger, edited by David Stern, is devoted to the study of this issue.
A brief introduction to Weininger's views:
It would be surprising if there were professional philosophers willing to treat this as anything other than a hack.