
Categories
- Art (225)
- Other (2,178)
- Philosophy (1,651)
- Psychology (2,334)
- Society (581)
Recent Questions
- What phenomena of modern life have found their expression in the philosophy of postmodernism?
- How to reconnect with nature?
- Does a person who was born blind and deaf recognize themselves as a person?
- Is it worth taking a woman as a wife if she says that happiness and peace of mind in the family depends on the man?
- In the Simpsons, white people are yellow, black people are black, isn't that racist ?
I would suggest the following division, which, in my opinion, is the most widespread and meaningful.
However, it should be noted that any division here is conditional. Much depends on the context and on the language in which the author writes, as well as what discipline and school the author uses these terms belongs to – in different contexts, these words can be used with their own nuances.
When talking about post-structuralism and post-hedonism, some use these terms interchangeably, noting that researchers refer to the same authors as either postmodernists or post-structuralists. This position can be found, for example, in the Oxford Handbook of International Relations in the article Poststructuralism/Postmodernism:
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy even opens the article “Postmodernism” with the words ” that postmodernism cannot be defined is a truism.”