Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,009)
Recent Questions
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
- Do people with Down syndrome understand that they have abnormalities? How do they see the world? Are they self-conscious about their illness?
The most important and productive method is to get information using what nature has given us – sight, touch, and hearing. Well, and taste sensations, probably (although it is fraught with unpleasant consequences, for example, studying mushrooms “to taste”). We observe facts and phenomena directly, and then reason comes into play. The information received is analyzed, and the causes, process, and consequences are clarified. Analogies and logic methods are used. After that, the second place is taken by methods of obtaining secondary information – studying other people's experience, eyewitness accounts, books on the topic, films, etc. And then comes the turn of scientific methods, observational statistics, physical and chemical analyses. But there are also methods that are denied or not supported by science, intuitive, modeled by fantasy based on feelings and emotions. Because “I think so.”..