- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
You would rather think about “not why”,”and why”.
Try to find the reason why a person steals money from the store.
Certainly not because it amuses him, but because he has no money.
Yes, they can put him in jail, but it won't get any worse that he or someone close to him might starve to death.
In addition, “maybe they won't get caught”, 99% are guided by this.
Everything is simple. Most of them are guided by one thought, that – It will be later. And now is my time! People want to play. They want to take risks. Tickle your nerves. + Get a bonus Advantage over others.
A living example of Furgal. He's been playing this dangerous game for a long time, and … do you think he regrets what he did? 99.9% that no. If he had started life over again, he would have lived it the same way.
First of all, sooner or later, they will really reveal it. But sometimes “late” doesn't matter anymore. For example, after the death of a criminal.
Secondly, not all crimes are solved. For example, Jack the Ripper is still incognito, and more than 100 years have passed since his time.
Third, there is an overestimation of your capabilities, when it seems that you will cope with what others have not coped with. By the way, in some areas of life this is a really useful property, but not in this case.
Why do people lie when everything secret becomes clear? Why would people cheat if it was known one day? Why do people drink if they can get seriously poisoned? Etc.
Probably because we are all different, grew up in different environments, with different approaches to education, and each person grew up with their own personal beliefs about what is good and what is bad.Therefore, if you are a child faced with an unpunished act towards you, then most likely in the future you will have a fad in this regard, that if a situation with impunity happens to someone, then this can also happen to you ) Who does not take risks, he does not drink champagne, and who takes risks drinks anything поп
Well, to answer briefly and directly, people commit crimes in order to get what they want) physical or not, but what they want.
Not everyone is disclosed. Very far from all of them. There are criminals who are, to put it mildly, stupid. Those are immediately caught. And after the capture, they are very sorry for what they did.
And there are criminals who consciously do everything, realizing that they can make a noise. They think carefully about everything, trying to avoid the risk of disclosure as much as possible. But they are also ready to go to jail.
Previous “experts” made a fundamental mistake because of which no one gave the correct answer. The mistake is that the state as a measure of morality is very unreliable. Previously, racism and segregation were legal, and during the Second World War, everyone who looked at least a little like a Jew and/or a Gypsy was completely exterminated. And all these nightmares were legitimate.�
So, guys, the correct answer is based on the fact that legality is a sign of power, not justice. The state calls criminals those who do not share with them. Income, interests – there are quite a lot of options here. A simple example: a doctor who saves several lives a day, but works unofficially. Is he a hero or a criminal? From the point of view of readers, he may be a hero, but from the point of view of the state, he is a criminal, since he does not pay taxes.�
And, in fact, people commit crimes because their internal moral regulator is not always compatible with the external one (laws). Still, do not forget that everyone wants the best for themselves and their team, group (I hope you understand what I mean). It's just that some people have more opportunities to do this, and others have less.
By the way, on this site there was a question “What will happen if the penalties for any crimes are abolished?” The answers will surprise you.
Our thinking, and consequently our behavior, is completely determined by our ability to respond to external stimuli. I mean subjective perception. Sometimes people, due to a combination of circumstances, find themselves in such a position that their value system changes dramatically for a while. When this happens at the moment of making an extremely important decision, I believe that people commit those actions for which they later condemn themselves.
In fact, our brain struggles with priorities. Avoiding the suffering caused by a legal process is a fairly high priority. But at other times, under certain conditions, it becomes a higher priority for a person to commit an act of a criminal nature.
I think people in our country commit crimes because they are not afraid of anything.Many people do not even consider punishment as punishment.”I'll sit out and get out,” they say, ” what's the big deal?”They do not know the pangs of conscience. I think that if Dostoevsky had lived in our time, the world would not have seen a masterpiece in the sense of Raskolnikov would not have repented).
Because every criminal, from the stall bomber to Professor Moriarty , is Superman (so he thinks). Any deliberate crime is built on the self-conceit of the criminal, and the main message is “Here he was a fool, he didn't do it like that, but I'm smarter, I KNOW how to do it, and I'll do IT RIGHT.” not spontaneous) puts himself OUTSIDE of society, ABOVE society, and this is his main mistake. In 19th-century Criminology, I read about a crime that was truly brilliant, built on a knowledge of physiology and psychology. But it was also discovered. “What is invented by one person can no doubt be solved by another.” And the psychological motives of a crime are already the ABC of criminology. Since the time of Ancient Rome.