Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Monsieur, it depends solely on the philosopher himself)))
Or rather, from his views.
Very non-specific question. Philosophy is a huge branch of science “all about everything”, and in it, how… perhaps, in religion (I mean, in general, faith in God, gods, and so on), there are just a lot of different schools, trends of opinion, and so on.
Not to mention that morality itself is relative. it is entirely a human invention.
it doesn't exist in nature. generally. there are no morals and morals in physics or biology, astronomy or the water cycle in nature.
Therefore. if morality is a purely human invention , then the answer will be different every time.
if society x in time interval z thinks that human life is more valuable than animal life, then it is more valuable.
if for the same period of time there is a society j �that does not agree, then someone has more value, and someone does not.
�and so on ad infinitum.