33 Answers

  1. The number of people will start to grow very quickly.

    The government, in order to prevent overpopulation, will introduce a monopoly on increasing life expectancy and will allow it only ” necessary and useful for society.”

    This will be followed by a strong stratification of society into the “elite of long-livers” and “citizens who are not happy with this”.

    In the first decades, there will be a lot of people who are tired of living. Who have tried everything that they are interested in and much of what is not interesting.

    The most important thing that will disappear if the life time is greatly increased is the value of the life time itself, so extreme dangerous entertainment will become popular.

    There will be a sharp technological jump due to the increase in the lifetime of scientists. New discoveries will allow us to start active space exploration.

  2. To the fact that the questions “what is the meaning of life” will be ten times more. People of their pitiful 60-80 years do not understand what to do, where to go? What will they do with them? A radical increase in life expectancy is meaningless without radical changes in where to put this duration.

  3. An interesting question, there are many aspects that can be described that will be affected by an increase in human life expectancy.

    1) there will not be a sharp increase in the population, since in developed countries, due to the low birth rate, the population has already stopped growing (and for developing countries, such technology may be too expensive for mass use). To replace the mortality rate, these countries invite migrants to their homes. If life expectancy is dramatically increased, deaths will plummet, migrants will not be needed, and governments will become more nationally oriented.

    2) reassessment of risks. If the time of aging is delayed by 10 times, then the risk of dying from an accident during this period will also increase by 10 times. People will learn to behave more cautiously, never run across the street at a red light, fasten their seat belts in a car, and avoid flying small Russian airlines with an old fleet.

    3) political stagnation. This is not so good: in less-than-democratic countries like Iran, Russia, and Venezuela, the rulers will hold on to power for the rest of their lives, knowing that if they lose power, they will wait for a trial by their successors. This will definitely not contribute to the country's development, countries with developed democratic institutions and a working succession of authorities will gain an advantage, and autocratic regimes will become a thing of the past.

    4) cultural stratification. Older people will watch movies and listen to music that is completely incomprehensible to young people. I like the singer Anastasia Vyaltseva, and I'm sorry that young people are not interested in such songs, and she would have turned 150 years old next year – just a little! What would happen if my favorite artists were 3-4 times older, for example, 500-600 years old? I think that then the cultural code of different generations would be too different and they would often simply not understand each other. Although on the other hand, some conventional Pugacheva could perform for several hundred years and be loved (and bored too) by different generations. But, like politicians, it would not allow younger artists to enter the stage, and a political stagnation would form on the stage. It would be the same in other areas, and it would be more difficult for young people to make a career.

  4. An interesting question, there are many aspects that can be described that will be affected by an increase in human life expectancy.

    1) there will not be a sharp increase in the population, since in developed countries, due to the low birth rate, the population has already stopped growing (and for developing countries, such technology may be too expensive for mass use). To replace the mortality rate, these countries invite migrants to their homes. If life expectancy is dramatically increased, deaths will plummet, migrants will not be needed, and governments will become more nationally oriented.

    2) reassessment of risks. If the time of aging is delayed by 10 times, then the risk of dying from an accident during this period will also increase by 10 times. People will learn to behave more cautiously, never run across the street at a red light, fasten their seat belts in a car, and avoid flying small Russian airlines with an old fleet.

    3) political stagnation. This is not so good: in less-than-democratic countries like Iran, Russia, and Venezuela, the rulers will hold on to power for the rest of their lives, knowing that if they lose power, they will wait for a trial by their successors. This will definitely not contribute to the country's development, countries with developed democratic institutions and a working succession of authorities will gain an advantage, and autocratic regimes will become a thing of the past.

    4) cultural stratification. Older people will watch movies and listen to music that is completely incomprehensible to young people. I like the singer Anastasia Vyaltseva, and I'm sorry that young people are not interested in such songs, and she would have turned 150 years old next year – just a little! What would happen if my favorite artists were 3-4 times older, for example, 500-600 years old? I think that then the cultural code of different generations would be too different and they simply would not understand each other.

  5. As one of the options: an increase in the population of our species, overpopulation of the planet, lack of resources+cataclysms, military operations, fighting for territory. As a result, it is likely that humanity will begin to self-destruct until the population reaches the optimal number. And then everything is the same as it was before. People will live, but now the childbearing age will rise significantly. Everything will be the same, but slower. The stages of growing up will stretch over time. But it will take more than a decade for this to happen.

  6. 1 New brain diseases will arise. Our brain, like any other computer, is designed to operate for a certain period of time.
    2 Reduced birth rate. There are 2 options. If life expectancy increases only among the elite, then new technologies will not lead to drastic changes in the gender composition of the population. But over time, such technologies will become widespread and the birth rate will fall.
    3 Space exploration will become more realistic. In the event that the active life of astronauts increases to 100 years, flights lasting 20 years or more will cease to frighten. But this is only if the technology of life extension is elite. If it becomes mass-scale, humanity expects stagnation of science and technology. In a sense, it has already begun.
    4 The cultural difference between generations will blur. This is primarily due to the stagnation in the development (or degradation) of the cultural elite. New faces will appear less frequently, which means that the idols of fathers and children will sooner or later become the same. It's the same with fashion. Why come up with a new one if the audience for which the previous models are designed is still alive and well?
    5 Moral and intellectual degradation. The institution of the family will collapse faster, and access to all types of entertainment will lead to the fact that forms of entertainment will become rougher than modern ones(sex and violence will become more explicit). In general, we are not allowed to eat the fruit of the tree of life.

  7. 1) It will most likely be expensive. Very expensive and incredibly difficult, at least for the first few decades. During this period, the development will be experimental, no one knows the side effects, and only rich people in their old age who are willing to take an adventure will decide on it, and even then not all of them.

    During this trial period, in addition to solving problems with telomere reduction during cell division, they will have to transplant younger organs grown in the laboratory, repair their nervous system, make sure that there are no problems with the brain, and adapt them.

    2) Shareholders of the medical conglomerate involved in the development, as well as all contractors and subcontractors, will receive instant operating profit, and shares of all public joint-stock companies that are among those who made this discovery will fly to heaven in a short period of time even faster than IT companies and Elon's offspring are now becoming more expensive. Maybe a couple dozen times in two years.

    Various monetary and restrictive measures will be taken to prevent a bubble when these securities are drained, since there are no real sales in the corresponding volume yet, everything is based on expectations.

    3) By the end of this trial period, other rich old people who were 50-60 years old at the time of opening will start connecting. Well, in general, younger people will also begin to deal with the problems of cancer formation and implantation of implants in the brain (Maybe the problem of senile senility will be rethought, and by the age of 150, everyone who is not associated with heavy intellectual work will begin to show primary symptoms).

    3) Gradually, the cost will begin to decline, the profit will go from the real implementation, after the adventurers, immortality will be bought by just the rich, and not the most repulsed from the Forbes list, then the middle class, and then the middle-income (This can stretch for a couple of decades from above).

    4) There will be no restrictive measures. Explosive population growth, too, by the time the “Medicine of Immortality” becomes massively available, 50-60 years will have passed. If we take it from now on, then this is the end of the 21st century. The average age of the population of developed countries (including the Russian Federation)will reach 55-60 years, the birth rate will fall, the first waves of migrants (XX century) will be in the same group, new waves will also partially assimilate, and their birth rate will also go down sharply in the second generation (2050s). Given that people will know about immortality , they can generally give up children in advance, which will cause the birth rate to collapse to the level of the baseboard, accelerating the natural decline (Even taking into account the increased life expectancy).

    • We are more likely to stop the decline and get an adequate increase. This increase will be at best at the level of the United States during the first space race. Given the drop in population by then, no developed country will be soaking out over-population problems. As a result, after the mass spread of biological immortality at the end of the century, it will take us several decades to simply reach the level of the historically peak population.

    For example, in the Russian Federation, 1.5 million children were born last year. The death rate was 1.8 million people. By the end of the century, the population is projected at 125-128 million people. The birth rate may fall to 700-800 thousand per year. Now the country's population is 146 million people. As a result, let's say we have 130 million people in 2090. 800 thousand children are born every year.

    • The mortality rate is non-zero, and there are still a lot of deaths, since the causes are not only age-related, let's say it will be something like 100 thousand people a year. Something like this will happen if people stop aging. A total of 700 thousand people of natural growth per year. It will take twenty years to reach the current level. The problem can be ignored for another twenty years, as the country can easily handle even more people (especially since we will be rich by then, even if we are not on par with Western Europe). This also applies to other developed countries, but to a greater extent to us, we could not go into limiting population growth for 30-40 years, but twice as long. Well, because we would still not give up on 200 million people. All the same, demand will make the supply grow as well.

    There is enough food for everyone in developed countries, as well as space, although nedviga will start to grow sharply in price (And not only it, but all areas and land in general), but there will be plenty of time for a thorough study of the problem. Contraception already allows you to control the birth rate, no one will regulate the spread of biological immortality.

    • Rather, they will introduce birth certificates, which are played in a limited number as green cards in the United States. Or they will introduce a special tax on children, which will have to be paid by all families who decide to have them. Well, so that the state can use this money to finance educational programs, industry, the service sector, the economy, housing construction and other issues. The child will grow up, he will need a job, affordable education, medicine, housing. This is in addition to the fact that parents should also have money for the maintenance of the child himself while he grows up.

    As a result, the increase will not be threatening. Plus, these certificates can be revoked for immigrants to other planets. Of course, for Mars, so that a person can then return to earth, you will need the most complex genetic modification, cybernetics, bionics, intrauterine intervention (Low gravity), but still an option.

    5) In the third world countries, the birth rate due to the increase in living standards will also decrease by that time, although not so significantly, but the current beggars in 2080-2090 will reach the standard of living of at least the current CIS countries, and population growth will be approximately at the same level as it was in the late USSR or the USA in the 60s-70s.

    In the second quarter of the 22nd century, if anything, it will go to zero, to the border of natural decline. At the same time, without biological immortality, the maximum population of the earth will be reached (12-13 billion people). a person), after which it will decline and at some point stabilize.

    • With biological immortality, these figures will mean nothing, the growth will continue, but only at the expense of a sharp drop in mortality.

    But the tension will be wild, on the one hand, developed countries will not be afraid that in the 2130s they will have to face the fact that there is nowhere to take the population at all, even the migrants have run out, but at the same time the third world countries will be terribly overpopulated.

    • Yes, they are overpopulated in comfortable conditions, by today's standards. They will not live in shacks and ghettos, but in huge panel neighborhoods made of 25-story candles, as we are now. And these microdistricts will be many times larger than ours, not by 300 thousand, like St. Petersburg's Parnassus, but by several million people.

    But these comfortable conditions will not be compared to the current countries of the first and second world (Rich and middle-income), which will become even richer by the beginning of the next century.

    So, everything, at this point I was too lazy to write, you understand the meaning)

  8. From a medical point of view, this is impossible with these technologies that we have, and all because the human cellular apparatus is not eternal, even assuming that there will be some kind of cryo capsule, it seems unlikely. Well, in theory, assuming that this is possible, then there may be a lot of problems regarding the demographic position of the renewal of humanity. In some countries, overpopulation will occur and it will have to be addressed. I can assume that even we and if we find some way to a long life, then evolution with the help of the same viruses will control our population, this is if we do not go into the details of the evolutionary development of the world.

  9. Let's say it already exists, but ordinary people will not be told anything about it. So that things don't work out. And everything will be as usual. More rich people who will change their documents and re-pledge their assets to themselves. And the poor, as they worked, will continue to work and die by the millions. And they will also be used for experiments, all sorts of vaccines, and so on. To increase the life span by another couple of hundred years.

  10. The meaning of life will change. Everything will change, from the law and punishment to understanding family and personal life. For example, here is the penalty for murder, if a person spends his time behind bars 5 times less. That is, you will need to change the entire legal framework. Probably, the duration of training will also increase, since 7 years of training will be better than 4 or 5 years, and specialists will be better.

    Overpopulation of the planet is not threatened, since we will start killing ourselves for resources. Russia threatens to remain a “gas station” for centuries to come, as many people will want to seize its resources. So there will be oil, gasoline, gas and an army to protect it all, and there will not be enough money for everything else.

    And how to live with one woman of the 4th century? If after 20 years, the period of “Fakyu in the corridor of the apartment” is already coming? You can't live your whole life, and the number of children in the offspring can increase to 20. For 3 centuries, you can give birth to hundreds of children without straining.

    There will be more active space exploration because of the mass of people on Earth. Colonies will appear on the planets, and the value of a minute lived will disappear. Everyone will be even lazier than they were. And why rush, because you will have time to do everything you wanted to do. In fact, there is a risk of stretching everything that we do now for 20 years (family, apartment, etc.) for a longer time, and this means that wages will also fall. The financial sector will collapse, pensions will be canceled, as children will be able to safely support you.

    In fact, the concept of “love” will be blurred, since a bunch of children from different marriages, you can't help everyone. You will see some of them once in a lifetime, and some of them will not be seen at all for centuries, because you are on different planets, in different solar systems. The family, as an institution, will cease to exist completely.

  11. To the fact that those 2%, in whose hands 90% of the planet's resources are concentrated, will also live much longer than the other 98%, and will be able to achieve even greater prosperity and power, although gradually the cost of technology will become cheaper and more affordable, as is the case with all new technologies, which will lead to an acceleration of overpopulation of the planet, an economic crisis and a third world war, unless of course the long-lived sages can solve the problems of overpopulation and hunger with the help of science.

  12. If this happens, then in one case. A person will cease to be a person. These will be cybergs, consisting of half of metal and plastic and half of meat and bones. Tellingly, all this is still being observed.

  13. The answers are standard, in the style of ” there will be stagnation, people will be sad, you will have to introduce restrictions.” Birth restrictions aren't what you are. Restrictions on new privileges. Well, the average man in the street does not like the idea of not only immortality, but even a significant extension of life.

    The only unambiguous and major negative that will definitely happen is the sharply increased submissiveness of people to potential dictatorships. It's, you know, like the submission of a hungry man, something out of this opera. The desire for heroism and the risk of political struggle will sharply decrease. Please note that in this case, power-hungry males will now be eternal. Stalin will not become decrepit and will not be outwitted by the young Beria. Mad Lenin will last forever. He will continue to carry out the red terror forever and ever, simply because he is a sadistic killer.

    But this is not a reason to abandon immortality, life extension, and scientific progress. Because I'm not an idiot or a moron. Meanwhile, all these terrible disadvantages will DEFINITELY be there. This isn't conservative gibberish from the other answers.

    The price is high. But it's worth it.

  14. I read the comments before replying – everyone puts the cart before the horse! The world will change if people live for 500-600 years. But with what?! do people deserve this? Nothing! Why do they live longer now than in the past? The condition of life has been changed. Therefore, when they create it!!! imagine the conditions for living for half a thousand years, then they will live … What will it lead to? To a strict but natural regulation of the population. And an appropriate lifestyle will be necessary…

  15. The Vedas describe past highly developed human civilizations, when people lived up to 1,000, 10,000, and 100,000 years, respectively. There is no need for scientific discoveries. This is a natural property. To understand the life of such a long-lived person, it is enough to compare us with animals that live for 10 years, 1 year and 1 month.

    I don't think it will lead to anything special in general. People will rely more on themselves, their minds, memories and bodies, rather than on material supports and devices that will deteriorate under the influence of the time force very quickly relative to a person's life. Only products made of some precious metals and alloys corresponding to their properties can remain popular, as they will remain unchanged for tens of thousands of years. This reflects the general principle that civilization uses technologies and products that are not easily destroyed over time, which is not so easy. Perhaps some kind of space management technologies, since there is a theoretical possibility of creating long-term spatial structures.

  16. Humanity will be ruled by a handful of very rich centenarians,and nothing will be extended to mere mortals.In principle, nothing much will change.

  17. There is data from the track of past lives about what is there… where is the capital planet of the confederacy near a small star near Sirius, those who gave the planet Earth the status of Al-Katras, to launch the prisoners into a cycle of oblivion due to their antisocial behavior, intolerance of the system and the status quo… That there is the main problem of a person-the inability to die. You are trained and must, your body is cured and you must. You don't belong to yourself for a long time and you don't have the right to just run away and start all over again, without debts. There will be no overpopulation beyond the Earth's ability to feed. Stillborn babies will be born, if anything, or die in the first two or three days after birth. The number of human spirit beings is limited, and the body has long been degraded and unable to survive without the support of an immortal spirit being. That's not the point. It's that survival is the impulses generated by decisions to continue participating in life. And over time, they tend to turn around to escape from life, to death, with the same force with which they were once directed to continue, having learned the experience of defeats and losses. Without the development of spirit technologies, the process of immortalizing the body is a long-solved and meaningless task, since it leads to human degradation. And those who plan their parents and transfer the inheritance to an unborn child and die to revive a new body, this situation with mortality does not upset much.

  18. Nothing good. To do this, we need to radically change the very vector of human existence. And we obviously don't want to become people of a different formation. Everything is much more prosaic here. Loans, mortgages, zeroing the terms of the presidency. Think about what will happen to our country if this happens.

  19. If the opposite is true, then it is very wise to create conditions where the life expectancy of generations is about 45 years. At this stage of human development, this is optimal. Judging by the answers, any other alignment in the direction of increasing life expectancy without taking into account the opinion of the Creator of life, leads to catostrophic consequences. And I also agree with this , with one caveat that people will not come up with any method to extend life at all.

    Although I am convinced that people will live forever in the future. But here, as with self-driving cars , it's not about technology, but about legal support. We cannot do without a radical restructuring of the human governance system. The current world political system will not be able to implement proper governance for the eternally living people, as it is extremely imperfect and is only suitable for maintaining relative order, and then with difficulty.

  20. People should work on people's happiness, get better, create families, develop science. Those who break the law will be isolated from society and forced to work by the stick method, and the carrot will be a normal life in isolation, where there is something to eat, where you can sleep, you don't have to think about what to do, but only work in moderation, there will be friends-prisoners who will not be allowed to harm you. Paradise. And you will have children, but they will have to prove that they did not take after their parents. Life without isolation should and will be better. If we achieve this, it doesn't matter who will be the leader, because there will be happiness. And there will be longevity. Unite and build a better life for yourself and others. Good is working for the good of yourself and other good people.

  21. A period of prolonged stagnation will begin, which will end in global extinction. Eternal rulers will come to power, people will stop reproducing – because the survival instinct is responsible for this, which will have nothing to worry about. Stagnation in everything-science, education, personal life, social life. Pensions will be abolished, and many offices will be closed. Our entire current life is set up according to a simple scenario: “Born, raised, learned, made offspring, worked, retired, died.” And now imagine, 500 years ahead – after “learned” everything else is meaningless. The society will be built according to new rules. Add to this the fatigue of life. By the age of 50, people have “seen everything and know everything.” And then by 50-and you will still be the same, full of strength and health, fantasy will look for new adventures and emotions. The worst perversions will only be a soft start.

  22. By making the rich live longer, they will accumulate even more wealth and influence. Perhaps there will be cults and communities of the long-lived, which will be accepted with the rite.

    If you think that they will invent a tool and share it with the whole world , then you are mistaken. Only a select few will receive it, and this will create a huge threat to freedom and an obstacle to the renewal of society. After all, when someone keeps his post for centuries, everyone else-smart, young, promising – who could take it, there is an internal breakdown and the meaning of life is called into question.

  23. I first thought about this when I read about the Struldbrugs (Gulliver Swift's travels), so if people stay together for a long time (or forever) living is not the same as being forever young and healthy.
    In passing, I will note that I often meet the opinion that children born after 2000 have a high chance of living more than 100 years

  24. There is another circumstance that is not taken into account here:
    If a woman will live long and be beautiful, will she agree to have children? Or put it on hold until her reproductive age is over.
    This may not happen in the first generation, but it will.

    I think the result of life extension may be a decrease in the number of people in the long term.

  25. It is not known what will happen to the human psyche after say 200 years of life. It is quite possible that they will no longer be people in the form that we understand a person now. Maybe their consciousness will cease to be human consciousness – or even consciousness in general.

  26. Smart people will keep this a secret and make long life available to only a few. Otherwise, even at the current birth rate, the world's population will increase tenfold, and smart people understand the consequences of this.

  27. No one will be able to come up with anything, because it is impossible to come up with something that has already happened. People had already lived for so many years when the Lord created the earth and man- Let's turn to the genealogy of the first man on earth, Adam. In the Old Testament, it is written in black and white: “And all the days of Adam's life were nine hundred and thirty years; and he died.”

    Adam's son Seth lived 912 years. Grandson Enos-905. Great-grandson of Kainan – 910. Great-grandson Malaleel – 895. Great-great-grandson Jared – 962. Next descendant Enoch-365. Methuselah and all-969! Record holder-long-lived planet. No wonder there is an expression Methuselah's age. Lamech – 777 . Noi – 950.

    But then people became mired in sin and the Lord shortened the years of their lives – Even before the flood, being angry with people who sinned with the sons of God, the Lord said: “My Spirit will not always be despised by men; for they are flesh; let their days be one hundred and twenty years.” This is why, dear readers, all the talk of scientists that a person should live 120 years. From the Bible.

    And then: In the book of Wisdom of Solomon we read:

    Do not hasten death by the errors of your life, and do not draw destruction to yourselves by the works of your hands (Prem 1: 12).

    Righteousness is immortal, but unrighteousness causes death: the ungodly have attracted it with their hands and words, have considered it a friend and have wasted away, and have made a covenant with it, for they are worthy to be its lot (Prem 1: 15-16).

    About the effect on life expectancy, the Bible says so: Honor your father and mother, that your days may be long on earth (Exodus 20: 12). In the beginning, man did not honor his Father. And as a result, man became mortal.

    so do not sin by attributing the Glory of God to intelligent people, because even their intelligence and wisdom are the merit of the Lord.

  28. We can only talk about 200 years.There are such opportunities. But they are all decreasing due to scientific and technological progress.The environment is deteriorating. The water is dirty,the air is dirty.The ground is dirty.Because of the greenhouse effect, the climate is warming. And this threatens a worldwide flood. And a person can no longer influence this. We need to think about the preservation of humanity.

  29. and it will be like in the movie Elysium, remember?the rich live in a separate station almost forever.and the rest are poor and serve the rich.

    500 and 600 I think there are already such people who live so much, just no one knows.

    in fact,the meaning of so many years of life?already at the age of 90, people get tired of living and they themselves pass away.

    people who suffer from terrible diseases, they die not because incurable diseases lead to death, but because people get tired of fighting the disease.

    how many people I knew who had cancer,they did not fight the disease,but simply lived to the fullest for the time that was left to them.

    as long as a person has a reason to live,he lives.and they die because they lose the meaning of living

  30. Justice will be violated…Many people in life are too lucky, a person gets everything from birth, sometimes it does not depend on his mind, abilities, efforts. Some are wildly unlucky, but they do everything they can. And there are medium options. You can deny it, you can sigh, you can cry, but it's true. But a short life gives it justice. It's really short, but we don't know how short it is. Not many people live to be 100 years old, and even fewer are able to enjoy something at this age, regardless of their financial condition. And 100 years, if converted to days, is only 36,500 days…Thirty and a half thousand, very few people associate with the concept of very much. If you take into account sleep, infancy, and old age, then 50 years is a real period of active life. Only we rarely think about it, I also didn't think about it before, until I read about the “joy” of the defendant in the United States, when he was given a sentence of 17,000-something days. This law was introduced in order to indicate the exact date of imprisonment, as sometimes the terms in years were confused. And the person did not immediately realize that he was given 50 years, in fact, a life sentence. But the word lifetime is not associated with 17,000 days.

    And this harmony cannot be broken by anyone. The main justice in happy lives and unhappy ones is their transience. You can't give one eternal penal servitude and the other eternal happiness. There must be a balance. Without balance, there will be perpetual revolutions, and brutality can reach its maximum limits. Even now, the struggle for equality is huge, and if you add more gas, then life will end in general, and for everyone.

  31. There is no need to worry about this, there are no such people on Earth and will never be. This is something that does not relate to human activity, but rather to the proregative Nature. Nature always regulates the process of the number of individuals in any population. Live and enjoy the fact that you live!!! With respect.

  32. If life expectancy becomes 500-600 years, then human development will also stretch out, respectively, by 6-7 times, that is, childhood will be up to a hundred years, then mature life will be up to 400 years, and then a long old age. Many people will have the opportunity to achieve enlightenment, due to having a huge amount of time to think about their lives.

  33. this is an unattainable fantasy, in fact, a person as a person is a brain, you can replace teeth, hands, feet, heart)), and the brain can not be replaced�, if the physical flourishing is a little more than 20, and the biological standard shelf life of the body is about less than 40 years, then the rest of the time is just a disease maintaining tone with medicine �continuous and useless struggle with the destruction of the brain, your proposal to suffer from, say, dementia for several hundred years is an unbearable test, again, the volume of information increases at a gigantic pace, it is already clear that a large part of the population is incapable of teaching natural sciences at the higher school level, the civilization of humans) caricaturally repeats the experience (with mice in a limited space with guaranteed food delivery). a person is unable to be reasonable and at any opportunity the brain will choose not development, but consumption, but in our system resources are also limited, so there is simply no point in fighting for an increase in life expectancy

Leave a Reply