Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,009)
Recent Questions
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
- Do people with Down syndrome understand that they have abnormalities? How do they see the world? Are they self-conscious about their illness?
From a psychedelic point of view, yes, this is true (although it would be nice to give the names of substances, it would be easier to navigate).
Just don't forget that the substance shows you only one facet of the truth out of countless others. Believing that this is the truth is equivalent to believing that the one-millimeter-square gray spot on an elephant's butt is the elephant itself.
To warm up my brain, I throw up a problem: yes, mathematics was created for a completely different substance, and at the same time this is completely untrue. Solve without substances (I'm not against substances, they just don't give calculators to children in elementary school, and we pathetic people haven't even left kindergarten yet).