Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
I think there is a second love, and a third, and a fourth. Here, as they say, the heart is not ordered. And I can't say that not the first love is inferior in some way to the emotions of the first love… In fact, it all depends on the person. If a person is amorous and romantic, then he will have a second and third love, etc.And if not, then probably there will not be any.
Well, it depends on what you mean by this word – love. The first is that it is always so clean and, at the same time, so impractical, inept and therefore romantic. That's why it's so beautiful and expensive. There is definitely no second first love. And then how it happens: You seem to have fallen in love and you're thinking: “I love you, and I want you. I don't think I've ever been so lucky and happy.” But with just one small remark: you know that everything passes. Now you know that at any moment “something dark and huge can come and break everything” (D. Vodennikov ” Not forever. About the first love. “Magazine” Russian Life”). And it is already very difficult to say to the new one, they say, ” I am all yours.” Because you know that “all of her” can never be. Because you have already given a part of yourself irrevocably to another. And now the response promises in the spirit of “forever”, etc., etc. sound somehow ridiculous, because “forever” is now just a figure of speech. No “forever” simply can not be. The first is sacred, I would even say transcendental. And everything that follows is much more viable, but it fits much worse into the concept of a miracle. But this is just my experience. For some, it is different. And I would call these people lucky.