- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
Religion differs from science in the same way that Russian folk tales differ from a documentary about events recorded by hundreds of video cameras, drones from different positions and heights, with interviews of witnesses and direct participants of the event. At the same time, the viewer is always left with the right to evaluate, doubt and criticize this film.
In the name of science, is someone blowing up people with the wrong quark color? Is someone killing the wrong deniers of the standard model? Have you seen a multiverse devotee burned at the stake or someone imprisoned for desecrating the feelings of witnesses to the planet Pluto? In my opinion, only this is enough to answer your question.
There is really no fundamental difference, but in practice the scientific method is famous for making predictions with a certain degree of reliability, which can not boast of blyadoesoterika.
the main differences are:
And science on the contrary is based strictly on verifiable repeated experiments
Science, on the contrary, is strictly objective, all scientific results do not depend on the personality of the experimenter, the observer.
By the way, this is where the “ambush” is for the humanities, they have no objective result, they are used by the same State power that supports religion, for the same purposes – educating teenagers in an obedient” socialized ” format for the state. For obolvanivaniya if in a simple way.
At this point, Atheism and the Scientific method of knowledge are completely one and directly opposite to Theism, religion.