Categories
- Art (181)
- Other (1,726)
- Philosophy (1,386)
- Psychology (1,932)
- Society (505)
Recent Questions
- Where did the energy to create the singularity point for the big bang come from, if there was an "absolute vacuum"? There wasn't even the word "void".
- Do cats get offended when they are stroked with their foot?
- At what age do the body and mind begin to age ?
- Why don't most kids like math ?
- What did philosophical psychology (i.e. psychology, before separating from philosophy) do? What authors and works can you recommend?
Pavlensky is a freak of our time. A hero is a person who either did something heroic, or if we talk about literary interpretation, a person who somehow shows typical features of society. Thank God, the society I see around me considers Pavlensky a freak, and not its hero. And I'm happy about that.
The very fact that someone asks such questions makes me sad… Attention to him as a media person, and even more so as a hero-sur. There is a shortage of outstanding and talented, unbiased people in our country(
I think you've got the concepts mixed up a bit. The expression “hero of our time” does not mean a heroic person, but a typical (or easily recognizable) representative of modern society. In general, it is used more in a passive-negative attitude towards the character than in a positive one. Lermontov's hero of his time is Pechorin, because then such fatalistic nihilism became popular. He's more of a scoundrel than a hero.
So Pavlensky is hardly a hero of our time. More likely Sechin or someone like him.