Categories
- Art (356)
- Other (3,632)
- Philosophy (2,814)
- Psychology (4,018)
- Society (1,010)
Recent Questions
- Why did everyone start to hate the Russians if the U.S. did the same thing in Afghanistan, Iraq?
- What needs to be corrected in the management of Russia first?
- Why did Blaise Pascal become a religious man at the end of his life?
- How do I know if a guy likes you?
- When they say "one generation", how many do they mean?
It was always connected. What, in your opinion, different Dumas, Michelangelo and Raffaeli worked there for free? No, they had huge material demands and the goal of selling their work was always not in the last place. Think of Russian writers who lived directly on the tsar's money – Gogol, for example, received a table from the tsar in Rome for several years. You idealize art. Anyone starting to do something doesn't count on Raskolnikov's komorka, no – as a rule, creators have a good appetite and a passion for traveling. In addition, you forget that creating art is absolutely not a free or cheap process. There are a few exceptions, such as Modigliani or Khlebnikov, but these are exceptions.